Self Destructive Messaging of Liberal Punditry..?

The so termed Liberal media pundits, have to learn about the well practiced clarity and simplicity of messaging, the art that seems well mastered by so termed Conservative media pundits. It is not enough to describe the problems simply and clearly, but leave the desired punch-lines and the key points of the message in the ether of rationalization, vicious and sometimes comedic satire, and employing partial agreement to opposing views coupled with a muddled articulation of the facts. I do not believe the right wing messaging machine can be that much more inspired and sophisticated than their left wing counterparts. The conservative pundits, however, seem to pontificate the 'matter of fact' gesture with indignant pomposity and self assured justification for their points of view with no self censorship, no self doubt and definitely no messaging restraint.

Why do the liberals and progressive media pundits seem to do the work for their right wing counterparts. The liberals in their quest to be measured and fair to 'both sides', end up digging up skeletons of their own side and handing the opposition, irrefutable evidence to nullify their own messaging. Message discipline is not a virtue for progressives but is a cherished creed of conservatives, republicans and their media pundits.

I recently saw an MSNBC progressive commentators replay, at infinitum, a video clip showing Presidential candidate Obama exalting his base with the following: paraphrase: "I would put on my comfortable shoes and join the Unions on the picket line, to peacefully demonstrate with them for their collective bargaining rights". Well the right wing pundits used this video revelation to deride President Obama for not following through with his campaign promise, making it look important to them. This is an example where the liberal pundits and the associated movement voices did not evaluate the impact of up-staging the very deliberative and thoughtful, constitutional lawyer, President, who understands the timing required to be effective when private enterprise operatives attempt to usurp the labor rights of the citizenry, through the coercive utilization of the political power of money, to compel elected government representatives, in this case, the Governor of Wisconsin, to use the pretext of economic crisis and legal responsibility, to deprive the working middle class, and especially organized labor unions, of their legal and long established rights to collective bargaining by public employees. To deprive workers the right for collective bargaining is practically equivalent to depriving a community of having legal counsel in product liability or environmental health violations. We are all now familiar with the name Mr. Kenneth Feinberg, Esq., imagine after 9/11 the families of the victims had to fight individually for their rights without a collective bargaining representation during arbitration. Mr. Kenneth Feinberg, who has served as the Court-Appointed Special Settlement Master in cases like Agent Orange Product Liability, Asbestos Personal Injury Litigation, and arbitration of the Holocaust Slave Labor Litigation, remind us all of the perception of fairness in the situation of human rights and survival. Why is the liberal and progressive messaging machine not able to formulate simple and effective populous messages that are not self destructive?

Liberal pundits and their supporters should not forget their own inflexible posture during the debates leading to the 2010 Health Care Bill, and in particular the adamant stance on the so called Public Option provision, which made it impossible to become a ratified provision, which could have garnered the desired 60-vote threshold in the US Senate. The liberal and progressives coalitions, in concert with their media pundits went as far as threatening some of the Senators with re-election challenges. The negative effect was manifested when the left wing pundits publicized threats from the liberal and progressive wings of the democratic party towards Senator Joe Lieberman [ID-CT] on his flip-flop on the provision for expanding Medicaid for the un-insured, as the more viable alternative to the then contentious Public Option provision. The intransigence of Sen. Lieberman, a very proud conservative democrat, was a direct reaction and repudiation of the left wings' impractical and sometimes irrational demands against reality, and essentially almost helped to defeat the Health Bill, but by the strength of President Obama's persuasive and political acuity. Sometimes the rhetoric of  'all or nothing because we are right' approach in representative political government is not likely to ever succeed. After what seemed the most successful legislative achievement, the passage of a comprehensive Health Care Bill in the US ever, the left wing activists and their pundit allies set out on a vicious collision course with their own democratic party senators and congress members, who they labeled as not 'fighting hard enough' for the more radical left wing health bill, the Single Payer System and the modified compromise, the Public Option. Through these contentious in-fighting and un-disciplined negative public pronouncements, the self destructive liberal messaging was incessant and dominated the media, thus the negative components of the Health Care Bill, as was claimed by the opposing republicans, overtook the laudable provisions that were actually contained in the health care legislation, and became the message that permeated the country and ended up becoming the destructive message albatross around the necks of the congressional democrats and the President, which falsely portrayed them as the the bearers of bad and over bearing government, the negative perception that has ultimately come to define the historic health legislation to a good portion of the electorate. Most of these democratic Senators and Congress members were defeated in the November 2010 congressional elections, resulting in the minority status of the democratic party, and therefore, making sure almost all the agenda and policies the liberals had worked hard for, rendered useless at best, and certainly standing on the verge of roll-back of the gains championed by Nancy Pelosi and Mr. Obama. Senator Blanche Lincoln [D-AR] was defeated by the liberal and progressive campaigns against her in non-liberal state of Arkansas, thus shrinking the conservative democratic base in the US congress, is a sad example of the Self Destructive Messaging of the Liberal Punditry.

The liberal activists who mobilized for the democrats and Mr. Obama in 2006 and 2008, self destructed in the 2010 congressional elections, strictly based on their 'my way or the highway' posture. I believe they de-mobilized because they did not get their Public Option in the health care bill. One would have thought these liberals were the intelligent class of the citizenry, and would have calculated that their own unilateral ideological movement demobilization, would create the space for opposing political ideology to exploit. This is the space the igneous republicans and their activist pundits acquired, and ushered in the tea party republicans, as a movement for the demise of the liberal agenda. When liberals forget to follow their leader, in this case the practical minded, Mr. Obama, the President, and further decided to 'eat their young', helping to defeat their own allies, the outcome is what we are all experiencing today. Political malpractice is the charge I levy on the liberals and progressives, who seem not to understand the political system in operation in the USA. Our constitutionally framed political system requires constant vigilance and well reasoned strategies on the part of the ideological purist, the liberals form of weak non-committed teenage-like intermittent activism and panicky call to action, is non-sustainable in a dynamic political system like ours. I detest ideological purism, but I admire ideological consistency when it is carefully mitigated by thoughtful consideration of the dynamism of the prevailing natural evolution of our society and political existence. In short, politics in US requires a clear understanding of the workings of what a representative constitutional government entails.

Liberals are very fervent in their believe in political ideology as do conservative political operatives, but the messaging for their respective political ideologies is where the similarities end. The right wing conservatives excel far and away above the left wing liberals, in the art of message composition and message discipline. Liberals seem very uncomfortable and woefully convoluted in their logic for the passionate expression of their inherent patriotic nature of inclusion and universal acceptance of differences between people in general, a trait not easily claimed or cherished by the conservatives, and can be captured in a simple but effective message campaign, in contrast to the unnecessarily laborious modes of liberal self expression; furthermore, liberals seem not to exude the prerequisite of desired intensity of conviction of their ideas that merit public admiration, and therefore, seem to convey very timid and inarticulate ideas. Liberal ideas, I should confess, are mostly better for the society at large due to their expansive and inclusiveness of scope, compared to the limiting scope and marked rigidity of most conservative ideas. What is holding back the liberals from such simple but effective and believable messaging of self expression? As a friendly caveat, I want the reader to be reminded that the United States of America is the most Prized Product of liberalism and liberal ideas, noting that, if conservatism and conservative ideas of government and governing had prevailed in the exceptional evolution of the origins of USA within this contest, the USA would have remained a colony of the British Empire!! We should all be mindful of that fact! Why are the liberals, their progressive coalitions and media pundits, not able to craft a simple message to remind the electorate of this fact?

Liberal pundits and activists are very 'liberal' with their messaging, or I should say, very careless and undisciplined in their message presentation. They mostly love to threaten the politicians and political operatives that agree with them even to the tune of more than 80+% of the time, and forget that they actually make the job for their common opposition easier, because the right wing media and opposing pundits just capture the vicious criticisms from the liberals and progressives of their own political allies, and highlight the negative implications, thereby, the liberals end up consuming all their valuable political capital to their own detriment, and the liberal focusing on the points of disagreement of their own caucuses, prolong the perceived negative connotation, which then translate to acute loss of message discipline within the political context. I contend that, the emergence of Tea Party Republicans, was made easier by the apathetic liberals and their weak but self-destructive messaging. Instead of the liberals and progressive coalitions banding strongly together to support their own political agenda and immense political and ideological gains as a result of the 2006 and 2008 elections, which at the time, were being successfully championed and exceptionally executed with precision by Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Executive Branch, they instead, turned their attention to minor divisions within their own ranks based on what they perceived as 'not getting everything' they wanted in the many legislative bills passed by congress, and thus reverting to what I call the 'Liberal Winners Mind Set'.

The 'Liberal Winners Mind Set', is the condition where previously dis-enfranchised liberals and progressives find themselves in power with responsibility to lead and solve problems, but after a few seeming successes, begin what I call, 'the self congratulatory leg of the leadership marathon', the mode where they truly need to employ leadership and message discipline, but instead, they start working hard to knowingly or unknowingly, breakdown the alliances, bonds and coalitions that had helped them ascend to power, in the first place. When this happened in 2009 and 2010, the message gab was quickly filled with coalitions made up of the right wing republicans and tea party republicans, who were well disguised and carefully cloaked in fictitious outrage about the economic state of the country, the near demise of the US economy, which had been created by these same republicans. The dawning of the tea party republicans seems to have come as a surprise to the liberals and progressives, and they were not prepared with a counter movement or message, which at a minimum could have challenged the key operatives like Former House Majority Leader Dick Armey [R-TX] and other prominent opportunistic republicans, who could have been made the poster children of the economic state of the US, instead, the 'liberal winners mind set' crowd, just sat back and hoped the tea party republicans would be discredited based on their past performance in leadership, burn themselves out and go away! The subsequent out come of this colossal miscalculation on the part of the liberals and progressives, is now not in dispute! The simplistic reason or explanation is the self destructive messaging of the liberals and their media pundits, but that will be a fallacy that clearly underestimates the strengths of the coalition of the right wing republicans and their supportive media pundits.

Whilst I write this blog, the political melodrama of Wisconsin is playing out in the media, and the classic seat-of-the-pants tutorial of political education of the US electorate, the ultimate crash course for political maneuvering, is jarring the minds of the usually absent minded general public, liberals, conservatives and independents. The elected politicians who believe in corporatism and are working on behalf of private enterprises are being exposed as they work hard to usurp the public sector concept of fairness for the US middle class, and the social liberals are rapidly cultivating cast iron backbones necessary to withstand the onslaught from their own elected leaders, who they just found out, are beholding to and completely controlled by the power of money in politics. The message bearers from the liberals side of the ideological spectrum, are tightening up their loose talk, and their playground dares are favorably and fairly being vetted. Denoting the self destructive nature of the liberal messaging is an observation that seem to pan out regularly when political ideological debates and conflicts arise, because the self congratulatory liberals never fail to celebrate their perceived successes, prematurely! The the left wing, liberal and progressive strategists and their media pundits, profusely are complementary and conciliatory in their messaging, which does not help advance their conviction and believes to the society at large, but tend to impress and/or satisfy people who already believe in their argument, but carefully and meticulously ignore the true intended target of their message, which should be the right wing ideologues, the ones the liberal message should be intended to forcefully persuade, in an attempt to win some of them to the liberal side, or at a minimum, give the organized opposition, significant amount of work in formulating their non-plausible counter message. In other words, the liberal messaging machine has to learn not to destroy their own ideological campaigns before they have had a chance to take hold.

I am very sure a lot of liberals and ideological progressives will disagree with my characterization of the lack of effectiveness of their messaging, and may point to the not so distant but recent political successes, the democratic controlled Congress of Nancy Pelosi, but should not forget the non-sustainability of those memorable political gains, which I am attributing to their muddled messaging and ineffectual presentation of ideas, and therefore, highlight the Self Destructive Messaging of Liberal Punditry and their political operatives...

'Hatred Mantra', Tactic of Right Wing Republicans?

I chose this topic after watching [NFL] Super Bowl pre-show interview of the US President, conducted by Bill O'Reilly of FOX News. In his usual disrespectful, pushy and tabloid interviewing style, Mr. O'Reilly persistently asked the President to acknowledge that some people, who mostly watch Fox News' O'Reilly show, Hate Mr. Obama. Shockingly amazing, I thought, shockingly a classic right wing republican engaging in the usual self absorbed and over inflated egotistical expression of self importance!

The use of Hate as a political pejorative, and as political strategy to perpetuate political ideology, is now very prevalent in the US. I am sure the nasty tone in political discourse has possible historical corollaries and simplified historical equivalences, but these contentious and downright hostile muscular political confrontations, are becoming increasingly difficult to accept as the new criteria for civil political discourse. It is very disgraceful and scary to see and sometimes hear elected members of US congress engage in this hate culture, but becomes frighteningly worst, when these same US congress persons publicly condone actions and implied threatening actions of deranged lunatics in their constituency. What follows is a description of what I term the 'Hatred Mantra' prevalent in our current political climate.

The origins are quite simple for anyone paying attention to the political dynamics in the US. Simply described, the brain trust of the right wing republican operatives, concoct a value system, which they use to classify the electorate [voters] into conforming and non-conforming political ideological blocks. The value system of the right wing conforming ideological block is then expanded to include many of the prevailing dogmatic believe systems, such as, social class distinctions, race and ethnicity demarcations, perceived cultural identity claims, and the most potent classification of all, dogmatic religious believes. The believe system becomes a pseudo-crusade with emotionally charged deity proclamations, which then serve to inflame passions among the electorate. Social issues as Women's Reproductive Rights [Abortion Rights] is a prominent example, because of the connotation attributable to its interpretations firmly rooted in religious fervor. It is frightening to me, to think that the self-proclaimed political conservatives [right wing republicans], willingly accept the imposition of government on these social issues, at same time they profess to not believe in the power of an over bearing government. What a glaring hypocritical contradiction in their value system! Why are the right wing republicans so enthralled by government control of the Civil Liberties of Women in our society? Remember, the moral majority movement of the 1980s, led by Jerry Falwell, and the Christian Fundamentalist, and the present day Evangelicals, the Nationalist proclaimers, the Patriotic and Flag Waving impostors, the ones that claim to love veterans of our wars, but want to deprive same of their earned benefits. These are some of the tenets of the value system of right wing republicans, which is full of dishonest practitioners parading through our political culture, and firmly interspersed within our political infrastructure, sadly to the detriment of the un-informed electorate [voters] and the nation at large.

Out of the right wing republicans' value system, evolves the de-valuation system [demonization and delegitimization] used to characterize people whose believes and opinions are contrary to right wing intolerance and inflexibility. In particular, people who do not ascribe to the right wing value system, are labelled as not being main-stream, and most times, called Un-American and/or 'different', and are targeted with incessant mantras of Hate and Moral [but religiously acceptable] De-Humanization. The de-valued opposition are further characterized with derogatory labels as: 'Baby Killers' for those who believe in abortion and reproductive rights for women; 'Atheist and anti-Religious' for skeptics of political ideology cloaked in religious dogma; 'Socialists and Communists' connotation for thoughtful democrats and independents who advocate for economic and social fairness. As a classic example, remember in 2009 President Obama reluctantly but correctly bailed-out Wall Street Bankers and the Financial Industry, and managed to avert total depression and collapse of the US economy, but when he [Mr. Obama] introduced prudent financial reforms to mitigate future economic collapse, the right wing republicans labelled Mr. Obama a Socialist and a Wealth Re-Distributer!! Can anyone imagine a socialist intent on bailing out a collapsing capitalist system? A true thoughtless picture to consider.  .... incredible!!

Once the de-legitimization [demonization] processes take hold, either by the constant repetition by right wing republican media advocates and pundits, and further picked up and propagated by the non-critical but trend-following main stream media, then any proposals and/or ridiculous claims made to fit the right wing value system, become acceptable to the loud right wing republican minority and their media pundits. Furthermore, the lack of concerted, organized and credible opposition from timid liberals and sensible but apathetic independents and libertarians, allow the right wing republicans' hatred mantras to take hold, and appear as the prevailing doctoring for perpetual social debate and conflict. In so doing, the cherished tradition of healthy political debates descend into colorful expression of moral superiority and the dubious justifiable expression of hatred towards opponents. Why is this phenomenon not obvious to the electorate [voters]?

I am fascinated by these same right wing republicans coming up with excuses to exempt their own closeted hypocrites when such actions they purport to hate, tend to be what their private lives have long been defined by. The morally professed evangelicals, claim to hate homosexuals, [and homosexual life-style, whatever that means] as the curse for the demise of our moral and religiously righteous society, and vehemently utilize inhumane treatment and campaigns to persecute such persons, until, lo and behold, the popular and charismatic evangelicals like Ted Haggard and Eddie Long; and prominent politicians, like Former Sen. Larry Craig and Congressman Mark Foley, get exposed for who they really are, then hating these self-righteous hypocrites, as would have been expected from the inflexible right wing value system, become turned into a religious experience, cloaked in the flexible concept of forgiveness and redemption for sinners, and the loud-mouthed pundits become muted. Remember, the right wing republicans never seem to have such religious compassion for their opponents!!

Why do the right wing republicans and their supportive media pundits resort to inciting the passions of the electorate with the Hatred Mantra? Because it is simple and targeted messaging, which allows the accepting and conforming electorate:

1. To hang their disappointments, personal failures, unfulfilled aspirations and diminished expectations. 
2. To doggedly and contemptuously assign blame to others for their own miserable conditions;
3. To effortlessly and without thought, discover the perceived culprits of their own current state of perceived demise.
4. To embolden the first time un-employed to be convinced ethnic minorities and new immigrants, the easy targets of hate, are the reason for their joblessness, without acknowledging their own short comings. 
5. To embolden families losing their homes, in blaming ethnic minorities who, although are also losing their homes, are labelled as the 'dead-beats' responsible for the foreclosure crisis.
6. To treat other citizens with opposing political views as un-american and not worthy of respect and support.

The reader, should not forget the caricature the right wing republicans have been allowed to create to represent the US President, Mr. Barack Obama. In my humble opinion, Mr. Obama is what I consider, the true realization and personal embodiment of what makes United States of America, exceptional!!

Based on 2010 congressional election results, it seems the 'Hatred Mantra' as a political tactic succeeded for the Right Wing and Tea Party Republicans. Arguably, the apathy and complacency of the liberals, progressives, democrats and young voters deserve most of credit, but that will be a topic for a subsequent blog. My question is, what will be the new political and/or social mantric tactic from the progressive political movements, as a counter perspective to compete with the hatred mantra of the right wing republicans? May be: 'Hope Mantra', 'Unity Mantra', 'Inclusion Mantra', 'Service Mantra', 'Aspiration Mantra', 'Bright Future Mantra', 'Achievement Mantra'... What is the shelf life of the 'Hatred Mantra', I ask the political progressives..?

My food for thought: The use of political ideology and perceived moral and religious believe contrasts as tools for the de-valuation and demonization of human life, constitute some of the pre-requisites and/or principal components in the formulation [operational planning], justification and subsequent perpetration of deadly conflicts [wars] between seemingly not dissimilar factions of society [most times, nations], and some of the instruments of justification for such conflicts, are firmly rooted in political ideology cloaked in religious fervor and apocalyptic imagery of the economic state of affairs, perceived as thrusted upon us by the targeted 'others' usually termed the non-believers and different, and fit perfectly in a 'Hatred Mantra' tuxedo!!  ... Never forget that....!!!

The Arrogance of Ignorance and Stupidity.. Tea Party Republicans?

All throughout the Fall of 2009 through to November 2010, the Tea Party Republications staged a well organized deceptive campaign under the pretext of reminding and educating the USA electorate on the virtues and contents of the US Constitution, the basis for the US Government, and further to teach us all the history of the foundation of our government. These notable names come to mind: Sarah Palin, Michele Bachmann, David Webb, Dana Loesch, Amy Kremer, Dick Armey, Allen West, etc.


These self appointed constitutionalists have a lot to answer for when we review the depths of their proclamations. It is interesting that most of these politicians seem to give reverence to Mr. Ronal Reagan, and hold their version of President Ronald Reagan's political life his and presidency as the ultimate benchmark. I say their version of Mr. Reagan, because the accounts and corollaries they profess most times, contradict Mr. Ron Reagan Jr's understanding of his own father. Yesterday, I read a publication entitled "Five myths about Ronald Reagan's legacy" by Will Bunch [see link: Five myths about Ronald Reagan's legacy ] which I consider very informative. I wish some of the notables, I give honorable mention above, get to read this article. It should not be surprising that these Tea Party Republicans and their leadership, in their own ignorance, make up [re-write] history to conveniently fit their agenda not to propagate the truth, but to exploit the laziness we all have, when it comes to history of the US, the US Constitution, and prominent actors of such history, notable of all, Mr. Ronald Reagan. A lot of us, the US electorate, fail to check the validity of made-up professions, and sometimes act as if we were not alive when most of these events actually occurred. In a subsequent blog, I will tackle the glaring inconsistencies in the economic policies and associated political ideologies, that somehow escape most of us, in the glory-filled nostalgia of yesteryears' rewrite of history. I remember Mr. G. H. W. Bush, during the 1979 presidential elections, when he described the Reagan Economic Policies as 'Voodo Economics'. A connotation and labeling, that in hindsight, correctly predicted the guaranteed disastrous economic outcome of excessive debts and deficits, of the policies Mr. Ronald Reagan put forward, and subsequently implemented in his US administration, Mr. Bush being the Vice President. I recall Mr. David Stockman, Mr. Reagan's Budget Director, famously quibbled: para-phrase "We know that Trickle Down Economics never works ...and will not work..", and subsequently left the Reagan administration. It is only through the Arrogance of Ignorance and Stupidity' coupled with deliberate amnesia that the Reagan Economic Policy worshipers and missionaries, can feel empowered to re-write the truth out of history.


Next, I ask myself, why will US Rep. Michele Bachmann even believe that, her conjured-up account of the history of the Founding Fathers being responsible for ending slavery in the US, is a plausibly fact to offer in her address and/or presentation to Republicans and Tea Party Republicans in the State of Iowa? The short answer is, she is exceedingly arrogant in her own ignorance to unfortunately, attempt to count on her perceived ignorance of her audience, the concept I term, 'the Arrogance of Ignorance and Stupidity'; because the limits of her own understanding is woefully and incredibly naive and parochial, as well as being frighteningly absurd. The question is, what is US Rep. Michele Bachmann's level of education either formal and/or informal on the subject matter, the US Constitution, which she had publicly claimed to have exceptional competence? Do not forget the public proclamations during congressional elections, last November 2010. Well, she says, she has law degree(s) from Oral Roberts University [J.D.] and College of William & Mary Law School [L.L.M], but the graduation dates are not indicated in her own published biography. I am not sure about a J.D. from Oral Roberts University Law School being accredited; but with an L.L.M from the reputable College of William & Mary Law School, I am sure the course work had to include some readings of the US Constitution, Articles of Confederation [and Perpetual Union], some discussions of the Federalist Papers, and definitely, discussions on Slavery and the Bill of Rights, etc,.. absolutely!!. Hmm..!! Lest I forget, the Associate Justice of US Supreme Court, Honorable Antonin Scalia, in my opinion, a truly brilliant jurist but too openly a republican political operative, gave a closed-door [closed-chamber] presentation on the US Constitution, to the US House Tea Party Republican Caucus, under the leadership and invitation of Ms. Bachmann, just days before her presentation in Iowa. [ See her speech here: YouTube - Michele Bachmann Iowa Speech Bachmann Founders Ended Slavery Mediaite ]. I am not sure whether the two colleges Ms. Bachmann claims to have obtained law degrees, deserve any credit for her lack of basic knowledge. After watching the YouTube clip, you would came to realize, and hopefully, be more aware of the cadre of leaders, the Republicans and Tea Party Republicans are offering, and what they represent to the US electorate and Political infrastructure. Remember, for these Republican operatives, Actual Facts and Truths are a matter of their own SANITIZED RE-WRITE of relevant history, and thus see what I term 'The Arrogance of Ignorance and Stupidity'. 

Hypocrisy of Republicans and Tea Party Republicans.. Oh Yes!

Tea Party Republicans, constitute the true creativity of using political symbolism, labels, imagery, phony expression of outrage and exploitation in US political arena.


I just saw a report on MSNBC [@1:00 PM EST, Jan 27, 2011] about Senators: Marco Rubio [FL], Ron Johnson [WI], Pat Tomey [PA] and other republicans, who courted the enthusiasm of the Tea Party Republicans, are now disavowing their demands, and 'revising and extending their positions' to claim a Republican Tea Party Caucus is not necessary. By the way, did I say, they are the newly elected US Senators, and have their 6-yr. guaranteed tenure!!. Well, 6-yr. tenure to the Exclusive 100 Member Club of the most powerful political operatives in USA, and the real power component of the Legislative Branch, very consequential in the daily and future lives of USA citizenry!! There is no simple process to re-call/remove any of these deceitful and downright dishonest politicians. But I hope the apathetic electorate, that bought into staged fictitious outrage by these politicians, will not fall for this hypocrisy the next time around, but until the next cycle, guess what we are left with?


Furthermore, has anyone noticed that, the so-called anti-government Republicans and Tea Party Republicans, all have most of their lives, depended on the government to get where they are now. Most of these politicians had their parents on the government's dime, serving in the military, using the G.I. Bill and associated funding mechanisms for themselves and their families, public school teachers, government employees and politicians at local, state and federal government level. I was impressed with Mr. Christopher Matthews of MSNBC [Hardball Program] and some of his analysts and contributors acknowledging this fact for their own up-bringing, through government sponsored educational opportunities and subsequent professional achievement. For this blog, I choose a couple of Republicans and Tea Party Republicans to point out this hypocritical and selfishness cloaked with political outrage and self-righteousness.


As good example, consider Congressman Allen West of Florida, a self avowed anti-government Tea Party Republican, and a vocal critic of government programs, and the imbecile who on the campaign trail denigrated Mr. Obama, our President. Mr. West boasts of the long military service of his family. From his grandfather, his father to himself. The military, our cherished institution of the highest service and honor, is the Ultimate government  employment, I hope Mr. West does not fail to see that fact. The educational opportunities, health care coverage for the entire family and other governmental service benefits, all paid for by the government. Mr. West, in addition to military service said, he was a public school teacher, another government job. All my research about Mr. West shows he NEVER worked in the Private Sector, so all his life he has been supported, and employed by the government. This is the mark of intellectual dishonesty, the manifestation the heightened hypocrisy, and the downright fraud the Tea Party Republicans have successfully perpetrated on the electorate. Congressman Allen West, is the same man that proclaimed that he wanted the US government to restore the country back to the original letter and intent of the US Constitution, the sacred document, that sanctioned him, being treated as 3/5-th of a person, since he is an African American. What a hypocrite with impunity and a person with excessive claim of self importance.!! Read more about Mr. West at [ Allen West (politician) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ]


Senator Addison Mitchell "Mitch" McConnell, Jr [R-KY], the minority leader in the US Senate, has a biography that again supports my point. Mr. Mitch McConnell, the loudest government bashing Republican, has never in his life worked a day in the Private sector, working for the government has been his only job. "Mitch" the crusader for private sector, as the only enterprise for creating jobs for the US unemployed, and strong advocate for the elimination of government jobs, happens to have always depended on the government for his own employment. What an irony for the uninformed electorate? I hope one o these days the numerous TV/Media hosts and reporters might ask, Mr. McConnell about his complete dependence on the government for his livelihood in the face of his anti-government crusade. Read more [ Mitch McConnell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ].

Senator John McCain, our unquestionably bona fide hero. Another basher of US government, who has never known anything other than the support from government in his entire life, from his grandfather through his father and himself. He has benefited from government and worked for government for almost his entire life!! How credible is his incessant bashing of Democrats for their dependency on Government? I am surprised the Democrats were not forceful enough to highlight Mr. McCain's dependence on government, especially when he introduced the fake 'Joe the Plumber' as symbol of anti-government job creation. Read more at [ John McCain - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ].
These examples are but a few of the glaring hypocrisy on the part of anti-government Republicans,.. Oh Yes!

There are many other Republicans in Public and Private professions that are true beneficiaries of government programs from their parents up through their current status, I wish the media/press reminds these people and call them to account instead of buying into their distorted narratives which are full of hypocrisy. Remember Tea Party Republicans telling their congressmen and congresswomen to: "Take their hands off their medicare and medicaid" during the health care legislation debates, during the contentious town hall meetings. Remember, Senator John Barrasso [R-WY], was vehemently opposed to the Health Care Bill, that made it possible for people with pre-existing conditions, gain access to health insurance. Mr. Barrasso's wife, Ms. Bobbi Brown is a breast cancer survivor, who I believe gets coverage from the government provided health insurance program for the US congress. Why were there no Democratic operatives, who could publicize that level of callous hypocrisy, I bet, if the tables were turned, the Republicans would have made Mr. Barrasso the 'Poster-Child' for callous hypocrisy and unfairness in the health care debate, and trust me, the electorate would have appreciated the exposure and would have responded positively to the democratic health care bill, instead of the ongoing mis-information, still being perpetrated by the crafty Republicans... Oh Yes!


Over the weekend [end of January 2011], the Republican Party leaders kept on telling the media, they cannot be specific on their debt and deficit management agenda for the US, at this stage of the discussion, until the President first initiates his plan. The disturbing irony was that, the Republicans further, claimed the problem needs to be fully explained to the American People before they come out with their solution. What..? Are these not the same Republicans who were publicly praying for the President's policies to fail, who refused to participate in solving the country's economic difficulties, and further told the electorate to vote them into power for their better, yet undisclosed policy agenda? Why is it plausible for the media to let these same Republicans parade their trickery and hypocrisy without question? Are the Democrats not intelligent enough to formulate simple succinct messages to confront and expose the incessant Republican hypocrisy and down right deceitful rhetoric, if the press would not do their job? How are the Republicans able to craft  'simple mantras' and simple 'message slogans'  that are clear and concise, while the Democrats get tongue tied into using long superfluous detail language to describe their agenda for the electorate? Where is the simple message, democrats? Do you remember, "Yes We Can"..? .. Oh Yes!

Conservatives traditionally are supposed to support investments in Educational Opportunities to enable people to be self-reliant and more productive citizens. As the President, Mr. Obama has correctly said: para phrase "The country that out educates will out compete". I am waiting to see the education policy of Republicans, considering President Obama's education-intensive direction for the future of the US. It seems the Republicans have endorsed and promoted mediocrity, lack of intellectual curiosity and under achievement, and have elevated certain people that can be characterized as intellectually bankrupt, and close to the edge of lunacy, as leaders. Some of the notables are: Ms. Sarah Palin, Rep. Michele Bachmann [R-MN], Rep. Louie Gohmert [R-TX]. I hope the Republicans get some Devine revelation about the blessings of education, and therefore, dismount their proverbial high horses and join the rest of us who want USA to remain atop the educational achievement infrastructure of the world. 


The sad conclusion is that, most of these anti-government Republicans could not have amounted to much in their own lives, but by the help of the Government they profess to abhor..! Hypocrisy at its worst, disguised as virtuous concern for our government.. Oh Yes,... Oh Yes !!

No Panic: China Economic Model not for USA.... Precisely!!

There is the classic panic reaction, some pundits in the media and other seemingly well meaning prominent and media-visible Americans, to issues that do not lend themselves to simplistic analyses based on scanty data; and most times seem incredibly naive and parochial in their presentation A lot of issues come to mind, but with the visit of the President of China to the USA, I must at this time consider the so-called economic status decline of the US in relation to that of China. What is the basis for this baseless panic?

I surmise the same question applies to other instances of recent political events. Remember the November 2010 congressional elections, where the Republicans posing as Tea Party activists were successful in creating panic, overstated fear and despair in the electorate, to the extent of inventing baseless but effective enthusiasm for the Republican party, and acute dissatisfaction and heightened paralyses and inaction, on the Democratic party. I call that situation brilliant in the political realm, but very destructive for the progress of our Constitutionally Framed Government, which demands a good outcome for the welfare of the US society at large. How is that relevant to the subject matter?

Is anyone involved and/or interested in the subject matter, but embarking on China bashing and raising the Panic Alarm volume of Disdain, Finger Pointing, and Blame Assigning, paying attention to the fact that China is a large Developing Country compared to our USA, the most Developed Country on this Planet [Earth]! It is important for a level of self introspection and a heavy dose of reality check.

US as the most developed country is the leader and trend setter for other countries to follow especially the developing countries, China being one of the largest developing nations. To underscore this claim I make, the President of China Hu Jintau himself made that statement during the joint news conference with our President Obama on January 19, 2011 [Check the Joint New Conference communique / transcripts]. Furthermore, developing countries [China] have the luxury of acquiring and adopting the benefits of the achievements of developed countries, including but not limited to advanced technology development and deployment.

In other words, developing nations, notably China, have had and continue to have the unmitigated advantage of: Imitation, Adoption and Adaptation, and No or Low Risk implementation and deployment of the Benefits of already developed infrastructure of well developed economies, USA leading the pack.

We should all be aware of the developed nature of USA in relation to other countries, and appreciate the collective connotation of the term of developed Economic and Political Infrastructure. Our technological advancement and production capacity permeating our entire economic infrastructure, is still legendary and continues to lead the world, and our Constitutionally Framed Government, the basis of our envied political system, is still fascinating for its effectiveness, malleability, organic nature, forward looking in concept, and structured-in complexities of implementation, that is truly USA! Enough already with the Panic mongering and baseless 'doomsday' mantra of US decline, that shakes my calm demeanor into controlled disgust with the faithless prognosticators! USA is NOT in decline, and I will bet my life USA will NEVER be in decline!!

To the Panicking pundits, the seemingly slowness for change and progress in the US economic and political infrastructure, the observed inertia, is a critical component of the representative government, a deliberately engineered feature for our constitutionally framed government. The rest of us, forward looking optimists, the introspection I call for, should consider these tenets of a developing country, in this writing, I use China, because of the obvious current economic focus.

I have already mentioned the benefits of the almost risk free and low investment cost for late adopter Countries, now lets look at the reason China, in the eyes and minds of the panic pundits, seems to be moving a head of US. The major reason, I assert, is the current prevailing Chinese Governmental and/or Political System, as a Blend of: Authoritarian, Dictatorial, Pseudo-Free Enterprise, and Pseudo-Representative Parliamentary System. Note that, I did not add the flavor of Constitutionally Framed Government [our cherished Free Enterprise/Capitalist Democracy] like the USA system, as one of the listed. There lies the difference, in addition to the markedly non-mature nature of the current Chinese political system.

Within the context of an evolving but firmly rooted one party Chinese government, consider these observations:

1. There is practically No Opposition [No Limitation, No Required Referendum, No Required Political Concurrence] on the Economic Policies and Direction the Chinese government chooses for their country. In other words, economic activity deemed necessary by the Chinese government will be [is] undertaken without fanfare and opposition. Thus, in China, Progressive Economic Policies and Investments, deemed necessary, will have unfettered support and unconstrained implementation. Unlike the USA which, in the current configuration of the government, has the Congress [the Legislative Branch] led by Speaker John Boehner and his Tea Party Republicans, opposed to any policy proposals from the President [the Executive Branch], irrespective of the positive impact or value to the nation [USA] at large. Most of the opposition in the USA are mere political grandstanding and score keeping. For example, the Republican Party and the Tea Party Republicans stood on the political sidelines in opposition to President Obama's policies for two (2) years, in order to gain political power, at the expense of any benefits for the nation's future. The seeming rapid and/or timely development activity of China, in certain sectors of economic activity can thus be partly explained. Think about it.
2. The critical foundation for economic emancipation, progressive economic development and guaranteed sustainability as such, require targeted investment in the Education Policy of government. The government of China, as has been well documented, has embarked on higher education as a required fortification for economic sustainability for its people. China has not adopted [or adapted] the You-Are-On-Your-Own Education Policy Model, that seems to be proposed and practiced in the USA, mostly advocated The Republicans and the Tea Party Republicans, who even go as far as wanting to leave the financing of education to the Free Market. Is it a wonder when we [USA] see our global education index decline? I read that in the last few years, China has invested in, and built more than fifteen [15+] M.I.T. type university equivalents to ensure that their educational investment output be among the leaders in the world. Remember this observation today, for future results. 
3. The solid foundations of economic activity and sustainability requires modernized Physical Infrastructure to support commerce, locally and globally. Physical Infrastructure includes: Highways, Water Ways, Aviation, Communication Networks, Internet, Broadband and Wireless Networks, etc. For example China is reportedly building super highways, bullet trains [200+ mph], expanded broadband network into rural population areas. Investment in physical infrastructure has not been a priority in the USA, and with vehement opposition from the Republicans and Tea Party Republicans a change in this policy is doubtful. Food for thought!

These observations encapsulate my early postmortem of what pundits, economists and social scientists may conclude in future analyses, but not to subscribe to the panic. Current economic data estimates the net asset value [total assets less total liabilities] of the US as being approximately three [3] times that of China. The USA, as should be expected, is still the leader for economic activity and throughput. I surmise that, with judicious management of resources, coupled with future leaning inspired leadership and well crafted governmental policies, added to efficient execution of private business activities and ingenuity, USA will continue to lead. No need to Panic, the China Economic Model is not suitable for the USA.... Precisely!!